What happens when a British pensioner moves abroad after a lifetime of paying National Insurance, only to find their State Pension never increases again?
This is the reality for over 450,000 British pensioners living in certain overseas countries, where the UK government’s “frozen pension” policy continues to deny them annual increases in their State Pension. Unlike their counterparts in the UK or in specific countries like the USA or EU member states, these pensioners receive payments stuck at the rate they were first entitled to, sometimes for decades.
The issue of frozen pensions remains a source of political tension and personal hardship. In 2025, this controversy has returned to the spotlight, not only because of renewed parliamentary campaigning and media attention, but also due to broader concerns surrounding pensions and taxation, particularly the freeze on the income tax personal allowance, which could soon cause even low-income pensioners in the UK to start paying tax.
As the debate intensifies, many are asking: how can a policy rooted in outdated agreements still affect half a million pensioners in an era of supposed fairness and modernisation?
What Is a Frozen State Pension and How Does It Work?
A frozen state pension refers to a UK State Pension that does not receive annual increases once the pensioner lives in a country without a relevant social security agreement with the UK. The UK operates a system called the triple lock, which guarantees that the State Pension rises each year by the highest of three measures: inflation, average earnings growth, or a minimum of 2.5%.
However, this increase is only applied to pensions if the recipient is living in the UK, the European Economic Area, or one of the relatively few countries with a reciprocal social security agreement that covers annual pension uprating.

If a person lives in a country that does not fall into one of these categories, their pension is frozen at the level it was when first received. This means it never increases, regardless of inflation or cost-of-living changes. If someone moved to a frozen country in 2001, they still receive the 2001 rate of State Pension today.
This policy is not new. It dates back decades and has been criticised by campaigners, legal experts and MPs as outdated, unfair and discriminatory.
Which Countries Are Affected by the Frozen Pension Policy?
The frozen pension policy affects a surprisingly large number of countries, more than 100 in total, including many with historic and cultural ties to the UK, such as Commonwealth nations. The disparity is stark, and many affected pensioners are unaware of it until after they retire abroad.
Countries Where Pensions Are Frozen and Not Frozen
| Region | Examples of Countries | Pension Uprated? |
| Commonwealth | Australia, Canada, New Zealand | No |
| Asia | India, Thailand, Pakistan | No |
| Africa | South Africa, Kenya | No |
| Caribbean | Jamaica, Barbados | Yes |
| Europe | France, Spain, Ireland | Yes |
| North America | USA | Yes |
This means that two British pensioners who made the same contributions, retired at the same time, and lived comparable lives in the UK can receive entirely different pension amounts, depending solely on where they reside in retirement.
Why Do Some British Pensioners Receive Annual Increases While Others Don’t?
The core reason lies in the existence (or absence) of reciprocal social security agreements between the UK and other countries. These agreements dictate how pensions and other benefits are treated across borders.
Currently, the UK government only applies annual pension uprating to countries that have a specific agreement covering the uprating of State Pensions. If no such clause exists in the agreement or if there is no agreement at all, pensions remain frozen.
This approach has been consistently upheld by successive governments, with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) defending the policy on the basis that “it reflects long-standing government policy.”
What makes the situation more controversial is that National Insurance contributions do not influence this decision. A pensioner who contributed to the system for 40 years receives no uprating if they retire to Canada, but another in the USA does, even if they contributed the same amount.
How Much Financial Loss Do Pensioners Face Under the Frozen Pension Policy?

The financial cost of a frozen pension is substantial, especially over time. Because pensions are not increased annually, their real value diminishes each year due to inflation and rising living costs. For many pensioners, particularly those without private savings, this can lead to significant hardship.
Estimated Losses Over Time Due to Frozen Pensions
| Years Since Retirement Abroad | Estimated Loss vs. Uprated Pension |
| 5 Years | £5,000 – £7,000 |
| 10 Years | £12,000 – £18,000 |
| 15 Years | £20,000 – £26,000 |
| 20+ Years | £30,000 or more |
In real-world terms, some pensioners are surviving on less than half of what their UK-based counterparts receive. For older retirees, many of whom live on fixed incomes and may have health or care needs, the difference can be devastating.
Why Hasn’t the UK Government Ended the Frozen Pension Policy?
The UK government has repeatedly defended its position, citing financial and political reasons. Ministers argue that changing the policy could set a precedent for other types of benefit payments abroad and that the estimated cost of uprating all frozen pensions could eventually run into hundreds of millions of pounds per year.
However, critics challenge these figures and argue that a phased approach or targeted reform, such as only uprating pensions in certain Commonwealth countries, would significantly reduce costs while still addressing the core injustice.
Campaigners also note that the current policy disproportionately affects:
- Older pensioners, who retired before digital information made this issue more transparent
- Women, who often have lower overall pension income
- Pensioners who moved abroad to join family or due to financial constraints
This ongoing situation continues to be labelled as geographical discrimination, penalising people not for how much they worked or paid in, but for where they chose to retire.
What’s the Latest in Frozen State Pension News for 2025?
As of late 2025, the frozen pension issue is once again under political and public scrutiny. The topic gained renewed traction following the Autumn Budget 2025, where expectations of reform were high but ultimately unmet.
While the Budget reaffirmed the government’s commitment to the triple lock and protecting pensioners in the UK, it offered no new support for overseas pensioners. There was no review announced, nor any mention of future reforms, which deeply disappointed campaigners and many All-Party Parliamentary Groups (APPGs).
At the same time, petitions have gained strong support, and pressure groups such as the International Consortium of British Pensioners and British Pensions in Australia have amplified their calls for fairness.
The media has also re-engaged with the issue, sharing stories of pensioners surviving on outdated rates and highlighting the sharp contrast between pensioners in different countries.
How Is the Triple Lock Contributing to a Widening Pension Gap?
The triple lock is often seen as a safeguard for UK-based pensioners, ensuring that their income keeps pace with economic trends. But for those living in frozen countries, the triple lock may feel like a symbol of inequality.
Because frozen pensions remain fixed, the annual increases under the triple lock widen the gap between UK-based pensioners and those abroad. Someone who retired abroad 20 years ago may now receive only a third of what a new UK retiree does, despite having identical contribution records.
This creates a system of two-tier pensioners: those who benefit from annual increases and those who are permanently left behind.
What Did the Autumn Budget 2025 Say About the Broader Pension Landscape?

While the frozen pension issue remained untouched in the Budget, other developments have sparked concern. Notably, the income tax personal allowance has been frozen at £12,570 until at least April 2028.
This freeze, combined with rising pensions due to the triple lock, means more pensioners in the UK may start paying tax even if their only income is the State Pension.
By the 2026/27 tax year, the full new State Pension is expected to be £12,547.60, just £22.40 below the tax threshold. In 2027/28, the State Pension is projected to exceed the allowance, making even modest-income pensioners liable for tax.
While the government insists that pensioners with no other income will not pay tax, this assurance doesn’t cover those with even minimal additional income, such as savings interest or small occupational pensions.
What Can Affected Pensioners Do to Protect Their Income?
There are limited actions that frozen pensioners can take, as the issue is dictated by UK government policy. However, some individuals may consider:
- Moving to a country with uprating agreements to restore annual increases (though backdated increases are not applied)
- Seeking financial advice to explore tax planning or supplementing income through private pensions or benefits
- Contributing voluntarily to National Insurance if under pension age to secure full entitlement (though this won’t affect uprating)
Ultimately, these are partial workarounds, and for many pensioners, especially those in their 70s, 80s or older, relocation or financial restructuring is simply not realistic. This further underlines the need for systemic policy reform.
What Might Happen Next in the Frozen Pension Debate?
The frozen pension issue shows no signs of fading from public or political attention. Although the government has not announced a formal review, there are signs that the topic is gaining traction in Westminster.
Several possible developments could emerge in the coming years:
- Introduction of a limited uprating scheme for select countries
- New reciprocal agreements negotiated post-Brexit
- A formal government review triggered by parliamentary pressure
- Legal challenges brought by pensioners or advocacy groups
Campaigners believe that 2026 could be a decisive year, particularly if public and parliamentary pressure continues to mount.
Conclusion: Is It Time to End the Frozen Pension Policy?
The frozen state pension policy remains one of the most controversial and emotive issues in the UK pension system. With rising inequality, clear evidence of hardship, and growing political scrutiny, the question is no longer whether the policy is flawed but whether the UK government is willing to act.
As campaigners continue to push, and public awareness increases, there is still hope for change. But until then, hundreds of thousands of pensioners will continue to face financial insecurity, not because they paid less or worked less, but because they retired in the wrong place.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is a frozen state pension?
It’s a UK State Pension that does not increase annually because the recipient lives in a country without a relevant social security agreement with the UK.
Why do some countries get annual pension increases and others don’t?
It depends on whether the UK has a reciprocal agreement with that country covering pension uprating.
How many people are affected by frozen pensions?
More than 450,000 British pensioners worldwide currently receive frozen State Pensions.
Can a pension be unfrozen if I move to a different country?
Yes, but only if you move to a country with an uprating agreement. However, no back payments will be made.
What did the 2025 Autumn Budget say about frozen pensions?
Nothing new was announced regarding frozen pensions, though the triple lock was reaffirmed.
Will UK pensioners start paying tax on the State Pension?
From 2027/28, the full new State Pension is expected to exceed the frozen personal allowance, which could result in tax liabilities.
Is there any hope for reform?
Campaigns are gaining momentum, and the issue is being discussed in Parliament, but no firm commitment has been made yet.


